<?xml version="1.0"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/rss.xsl"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>AppArch Work Item Rss Feed</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/AppArch/WorkItem/List.aspx</link><description>AppArch Work Item Rss Description</description><item><title>Created Issue: The download link seems to be broken... [9446]</title><link>http://apparch.codeplex.com/workitem/9446</link><description>Please fix it&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>gabrielas</author><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:33:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: The download link seems to be broken... [9446] 20120612063327P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: Provide a Reference App or maybe a VS Solution Template</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/AppArch/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=2998</link><description>ERDA &amp;#38; GBRI are at least 4 years old now...&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: rboucher ** &lt;p&gt;We&amp;#39;ve provided link to reference solutions on this site.  See the home page for codeplex.com&amp;#47;apparch.  People can also contribute their own at http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;www.codeplex.com&amp;#47;apparchcontrib&amp;#47; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We did have the budget to keep going on a full set of reference implementations, though we agree this would be helpful. Perhaps in a later revision. &lt;/p&gt;</description><author>rboucher</author><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:55:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: Provide a Reference App or maybe a VS Solution Template 20090114085528P</guid></item><item><title>Closed Issue: Description incorrect for the "Grid" Architecture Style (P29 BETA1 build4)</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/AppArch/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=3362</link><description>Hey guys,&lt;br /&gt;First, thanks for this great effort. I think it&amp;#39;s a good approach to clarify many of the technical aspects in software architecture from Microsoft point of view.&lt;br /&gt;I&amp;#39;m reading the guide start-to-finish and will post in this list whenever something pops up. Hope it works with you guys.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So this particular issue is calling out that in P29, in the Architectural Styles table, the Grid style is not described correctly. The description is presumably for the UI-Grid concept, not the arch style.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Again, great work guys&amp;#33;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: Yes, you are absolutely correct.  We removed the Grid reference from this area.</description><author>rboucher</author><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:52:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Closed Issue: Description incorrect for the "Grid" Architecture Style (P29 BETA1 build4) 20090114085250P</guid></item><item><title>Closed Issue: Communication is misspelled in all the diagrams</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/AppArch/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=3000</link><description>In the &amp;#34;Cross-Cutting&amp;#34; section of the diagrams, the &amp;#34;Communication&amp;#34; element is spelled with one &amp;#34;m&amp;#34;.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: Fixed in the final guide.</description><author>rboucher</author><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:50:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Closed Issue: Communication is misspelled in all the diagrams 20090114085055P</guid></item><item><title>Closed Issue: Missing .NET diagram (P49 BETA1 build4)</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/AppArch/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=3372</link><description>the diagram for the high-level view of the .NET Framework is missing in page 49-50 right after &amp;#34;The following diagram provides &lt;br /&gt;a high-level view of the .NET Framework&amp;#34;.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: Fixed in final release of guide. We removed the diagram and reference actually as it wasn't adding as much value as it was taking up page space.  IT was just a diagram of the evoluation of .NET.  Diagrams like it are available on MSDN or through a google image search.</description><author>rboucher</author><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:50:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Closed Issue: Missing .NET diagram (P49 BETA1 build4) 20090114085020P</guid></item><item><title>Closed Issue: Missing bullet for application type (P56 BETA1 build4)</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/AppArch/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=3373</link><description>the type sentense for Web Applications is missing a bullet in page 56.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: Fixed in final release of guide.</description><author>rboucher</author><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:48:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Closed Issue: Missing bullet for application type (P56 BETA1 build4) 20090114084834P</guid></item><item><title>Closed Issue: low quality diagrams (BETA1, build4)</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/AppArch/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=3374</link><description>there are some low quality diagrams in the PDF version.&lt;br /&gt;Specific application Archtypes diagrams in pages 56-60 are in low quality and difficult to read.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&amp;#39;ll be adding to this issue as I find more low quality diagrams in the document.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: Fixed all low quality diagrams across all guides.</description><author>rboucher</author><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:47:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Closed Issue: low quality diagrams (BETA1, build4) 20090114084759P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: low quality diagrams (BETA1, build4)</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/AppArch/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=3374</link><description>there are some low quality diagrams in the PDF version.&lt;br /&gt;Specific application Archtypes diagrams in pages 56-60 are in low quality and difficult to read.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&amp;#39;ll be adding to this issue as I find more low quality diagrams in the document.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: rboucher ** &lt;p&gt;Should be fixed at this point. &lt;/p&gt;</description><author>rboucher</author><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:47:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: low quality diagrams (BETA1, build4) 20090114084732P</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: low quality diagrams (BETA1, build4)</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/AppArch/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=3374</link><description>there are some low quality diagrams in the PDF version.&lt;br /&gt;Specific application Archtypes diagrams in pages 56-60 are in low quality and difficult to read.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&amp;#39;ll be adding to this issue as I find more low quality diagrams in the document.&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>fernandof</author><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 05:46:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: low quality diagrams (BETA1, build4) 20081111054634A</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: Missing bullet for application type (P56 BETA1 build4)</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/AppArch/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=3373</link><description>the type sentense for Web Applications is missing a bullet in page 56.&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>fernandof</author><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 05:27:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: Missing bullet for application type (P56 BETA1 build4) 20081111052708A</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: Missing .NET diagram (P49 BETA1 build4)</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/AppArch/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=3372</link><description>the diagram for the high-level view of the .NET Framework is missing in page 49-50 right after &amp;#34;The following diagram provides &lt;br /&gt;a high-level view of the .NET Framework&amp;#34;.&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>fernandof</author><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 04:59:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: Missing .NET diagram (P49 BETA1 build4) 20081111045948A</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: Description incorrect for the "Grid" Architecture Style (P29 BETA1 build4)</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/AppArch/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=3362</link><description>Hey guys,&lt;br /&gt;First, thanks for this great effort. I think it&amp;#39;s a good approach to clarify many of the technical aspects in software architecture from Microsoft point of view.&lt;br /&gt;I&amp;#39;m reading the guide start-to-finish and will post in this list whenever something pops up. Hope it works with you guys.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So this particular issue is calling out that in P29, in the Architectural Styles table, the Grid style is not described correctly. The description is presumably for the UI-Grid concept, not the arch style.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Again, great work guys&amp;#33;&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>fernandof</author><pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 04:34:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: Description incorrect for the "Grid" Architecture Style (P29 BETA1 build4) 20081107043419A</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: Communication is misspelled in all the diagrams</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/AppArch/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=3000</link><description>In the &amp;#34;Cross-Cutting&amp;#34; section of the diagrams, the &amp;#34;Communication&amp;#34; element is spelled with one &amp;#34;m&amp;#34;.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: rboucher ** &lt;p&gt;Thanks for the heads up shovavnik.   We&amp;#39;ll get this fixed as we move forward.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just to be clear - We&amp;#39;ll be doing a typical agile process for continuous improvement. We are going to expose information very early in the process to gain feedback.  Well refactor it many times. As such , there may be more misspellings in future.  Everthing will get a throughout edit pass before release.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><author>rboucher</author><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:23:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: Communication is misspelled in all the diagrams 20080919122306A</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: Communication is misspelled in all the diagrams</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/AppArch/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=3000</link><description>In the &amp;#34;Cross-Cutting&amp;#34; section of the diagrams, the &amp;#34;Communication&amp;#34; element is spelled with one &amp;#34;m&amp;#34;.&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>shovavnik</author><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:46:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: Communication is misspelled in all the diagrams 20080918094635A</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: Provide a Reference App or maybe a VS Solution Template</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/AppArch/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=2998</link><description>ERDA &amp;#38; GBRI are at least 4 years old now...&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>adrianporger</author><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:47:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: Provide a Reference App or maybe a VS Solution Template 20080917094727P</guid></item></channel></rss>